Criminal Defense News

 7.8 Million Firearms Applications Approved Last Year126,000 Firearms Applications Rejected

WASHINGTON, D.C. About 1.6 percent of the approximately 7,831,000 applications for firearm transfers or permits were denied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or state or local agencies during 2003, the Justice Department's Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) announced today. This continued a decline in the denial rate from 2.4 percent of applicants in 1999. BJS attributed this decline to an increased reluctance among potential purchasers to be subjected to background checks that now encompass an immediate review of many more records from a wide variety of databases.
The firearms applications were made pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, which requires criminal history background checks on people who apply to buy any type of firearm from federally licensed dealers.
The Federal Gun Control Act, 18 U.S.C. § 922, prohibits the transfer of a firearm to a person who:
Is under indictment for or has been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one year.
Is a fugitive from justice.

Is an unlawful user or is addicted to any controlled substance. Has been adjudicated as a mental defective or committed to a mental institution. Is an illegal alien or has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa.
Was discharged from the U.S. military service under dishonorable conditions. Has renounced U.S. citizenship.
Is subject to a court order restraining him or her from harassing, stalking or threatening an intimate partner or child.
Has been convicted in any court of a felony or misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

In addition, the statute makes it unlawful for any licensed importer, manufacturer, dealer or collector to transfer a long gun to a person younger than 18 years old or any other type of firearm to a person less than 21 years old.
Since February 29, 1994, when the Brady Act went into effect, through December 31, 2003, more than 53 million plications were checked and approximately 1,102,000 were blocked.

During 2003 half of the denials were made by state and local agencies and half by the FBI From 1999 through 2003, 58 percent of the denials by state and local agencies were for the applicant's felony conviction or indictment, 13 percent for a domestic violence misdemeanor conviction or restraining order, and the remainder for other reasons.

However, 2003 data show that for both state checks and FBI-administered checks, the percentage of application denials for reasons other than a felony conviction history has been growing. For the first time, more than half of all applicants were denied for a misdemeanor domestic violence conviction, for being the subject of a protection order, for a history of mental illness or for another reason. Presale firearm checks entail a search of more than 53 million records held in 14 separate national databases.

About 15 percent of the 790,000 applicants rejected since the Brady Act's full provisions took effect in 1999 appealed their denials. Of these, 35.5 percent have had their denials reversed. This is a denial error rate of approximately 0.1 percent of the 40.8 million checks conducted during that period. At the same time, about 7,200 arrests and 20,000 retrievals from improperly cleared purchasers took place -an error rate of less than 0.1 percent for improperly cleared individuals.

Contact us now to obtain a free case review or want more information on our Minnesota Criminal Defense Lawyers.

	Did You Know?
	Miranda rule and Miranda rights are important The rule, pronounced in Miranda v. Arizona, that confessions are inadmissible in a criminal prosecution if the police do not advise the suspect in custody of certain rights before questioning. The rights include: a. The right to remain silent and to refuse to answer any questions; b. The right to know that anything the suspect says can and will be used against the suspect in a court of law; c. The right to consult with an attorney and to have an attorney present during questioning; d. The right to have counsel appointed at public expense, prior to any questioning if the suspect cannot afford counsel.